🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is observed is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.